Skip to content

Miguel Estrada Wasn’t “Hispanic?”

The old joke is that the answer to why Hispanic men seem to spend a fair amount of time grabbing their crotches is, “because that’s all the Anglos left us with, and we check to make sure they haven’t taken them yet.”

Today, it looks like the AP has even taken the definition of the word “Hispanic”.  The headline reads “Sotomayor nominated to high court - first Hispanic“.

Except that she’s not, unless either the AP has taken away Miguel Estrada’s right to claim the mantle of “Hispanic”, or the AP has banished him from history and has done a Stalinesque rewrite.

So what ever happened to Miguel Estrada’s appointment to the Supreme Court?

Manuel [sic] Estrada was a moderate nominee - he worked in the Clinton Justice Dept and clerked under Justice Anthony Kennedy, who decided to overturn judicial death penalty and wrote Lawrence v Texas, overturning sodomy laws… Democrats obstructed him. 

Miguel Estrada’s appointment was filibustered away by Senate Democrats, which makes this thinly veiled threat by the AP especially snort-worthy:

Senate Republicans pledged to give her a fair hearing, and some questioned whether she would base decisions on her personal feelings, rather than constitutional principles. Given her background, any effort to filibuster her nomination could carry political risks, since Hispanics are the fastest-growing segment of the population and an increasingly important one politically.

The Democrats, in case you’ve forgotten, also showed very little love for the first Hispanic Attorney General, Alberto Gonzales.   Forgive me if I’m more than a little underwhelmed by Sotomayor’s nomination, and let’s at least be honest about what it means; it’s not about the Democrats’ love of Hispanics.

CORRECTION:  I carried Judge Estrada as “Manuel” instead of  Miguel - the memory dims…  que tonto fue…

Senior White House Aide Guides Democratic Rush Limbaugh Strategy

I’ve been watching the Rush Limbaugh brouhaha with some amusement - I expected that the Democrats would purposely misrepresent Rush’s “want him to fail” comment; that was a no-brainer, though if I were the Chicago machine, I’d be careful about thinking that this is the big gun they need to blow what’s left of the GOP away.  Why? Because their representation of the comment is a lie, and lies always have the potential to bite you in the ass; it’s one of those lessons that is hard learned, believe me.  Rush Limbaugh didn’t say that he wanted the Obama presidency to fail; if you hear the whole quote, he said that he wanted Obama’s efforts to turn the US into a western-European style socialist society to fail.  Big difference.

Rush Limbaugh is unapologetic, as I think he should be.  John Cornyn, however, is calling for the Republican Party to moderate itself, move toward the center and I don’t know - become Democrats? 

Yeah, that was a winning strategy during the last election - run a RINO and make sure he distanced himself from any conservative values.  They would have done better to run Joe Lieberman - at least the party he was distancing himself from was the Democratic party.

I see that RNC chairman Michael Steele apologized for his careless rejoinder against Rush.  Newsflash, Mr. Steele - at least Rush stands for conservative values, and isn’t kissing up to Obama every chance he gets, unlike the “maverick” you all ran last time.  And what the hell was Michael Steele doing on the D.H. Hugley show anyway?

Leadership by Exception

Taking a look at President Obama’s new budget, the first thing that stuck out like a sore thumb was the second section of the document, the “don’t blame me” section, entitled “Inheriting a Legacy of Misplaced Priorities“.

As a former Army Officer, and as a VP level manager in two industries and a partner in my current business, this drack literally makes me sick.

This is the legacy that we inherit - a legacy of mismanagement and misplaced priorities, of missed opportunities and of deep, structural
problems ignored for too long. It’s a legacy of irresponsibility, and it is our duty to change it.

Ironically enough, the budget is titled, “A New Era of Responsibility”.  But, you know, starting January 20, 2009 from the time we can quit blaming Bush.

 Hey - newsflash, Mr. President.  We don’t care about finger pointing or your bashing the man who held the office before you and what he did.  You knew the situation when you ran for office,  and you were elected on the basis that you were going bring hope and change to the situation.

Now it’s time to man up and take responsibility.  That’s what men do.  You know - “…the buck stops here”?

Stimulus Logic - Gone in Sixty Days

I’m trying to figure out my personal angle on the stimulus logic.  OK - Bush runs a $500 billion deficit, and the media goes nuts.  Deficits are bad, the effects are devastating on the economy, markets are crashing, eight years of bad decision making, and so on. 

Obama effectively quadruples the deficit in less than sixty days, and it’s brave, prudent, will put the economy back on course, will avert an economic catastrophe, all spending is stimulative, and so on.  Bush deficit - bad.  Obama mega-deficit - good.

I want to run with this so badly.  I’m thinking new truck, jewelry and furniture for the wife, mini-bikes for the kids, Smith & Wollensky bones for the dog.  As long as we pay by check, I don’t see the issue. 

Deficit spending, see?

Echoes of JFK and the Missile Crisis

President Obama is flexing his appeasement muscles at Russia - the same Russia that rebuffed his previous attempts to pucker up for them with this scathing dismissal.

Asked whether Russia would take concrete steps to respond to Washington’s overtures, Ivanov was cautious, saying: “It is not an oriental bazaar and we do not trade the way people do in a bazaar.”

In some of the most conciliatory comments from Russia for some time, he indicated Moscow was prepared to discuss missile threats with Washington and renewed an offer to use existing Russian radar stations in a future defense system.

Ivanov reaffirmed that, if the United States scrapped plans to deploy the shield in central Europe, Russia would not follow through on a threat to put its own nuclear missiles near the Polish border.

 So how does President Obama react to an overt threat to put missiles on the border of one of our staunchest and bravest allies in the area?  The headline at the AP pretty much says it all.

(Continued)

Another Market in Panic

In addition to the panic in the financial markets, there seems to be another manic in full panic mode; the ammuniition market.  Ammunition for center-fire weapons has either dried up or gone up significantly in price.  Even the components for reloading are getting scarce; it’s getting inceasingly hard to find primers for either pistols or rifles.  Not sure as to the cause, but in talking to my local Walmart guy and the owner of a reloading shop, they both independently agree that in addition to the obvious demand from the military, their customers seem to be hoarding ammunition and components in anticipation of “change”.

The Market Values the “Stimulus”

The Dow at 7,114 yesterday?  Wow.  This is the worst market I can remember, and according to MSN, is at the lowest point since 1997. Generally, the usual suspects in the media have almost considered it a non-story or talked about it in vague terms as being tied to the “global malaise”.  MSN cuts a little closer to the quick.

The market’s pain today reflected the fear that many investors have about how bad the global recession will be. And it was a visible signal of Wall Street’s frustration at how slowly the details to shore up the U.S. financial system are coming out of the Treasury Department. Some of those details are due this week.

Many investors have been betting that stimulus programs in China and possibly India could help reignite global growth, but reports today suggest economies in both countries show few signs of revival.

The Dow is off 10.5% since President Obama’s inauguration. The S&P 500 is off 7.7% since Jan. 20, and the Nasdaq is down 3.7%.

The key point is that the markets measure investor beliefs about the future values of companies, commodities and bonds.  Investors are looking at President Bush’s actions only in so far as they impact future prices. President Bush loosed a hurricane of red ink.  President Obama has unleashed a mega-tsunami.  MSN explains how the “global recession” claim is only part of the story.

(Continued)

Eric Holder - Americans Cower from Race

There’s something deeply ironic about being lectured to about the state of race relations in this country by an African-American US Attorney General who attended Stuyvesant High in Manhattan, and got his BA and JD from Columbia.  I’m Mexican-American and am the first generation fully engaged in working for that kind of privilege for my children.  I guess we’re a full generation behind the African-Americans.  Of course judging by those two elitist pricks, who in America isn’t?

Imagine what he and Obama could have achieved if only the Man hadn’t held them back…

More on this topic later.

The Texas Fireball - Don’t Believe the “Meteor” Cover Story

Federal Aviation Administration spokesman Roland Herwig said the fireball seen across a wide stretch of the state Sunday morning probably was a natural phenomenon and not debris from last week’s collision between an Iridium communications satellite and a Russian military space vehicle.

I have my own ideas about what the “fireball” really was.   NASA is here in Houston, you know.   I believe that it was a secret NASA experiment commissioned by the Obama administration to see if they could burn dollars more efficiently by shooting them into space and flaring them with a new super secret incendiary explosive.

Wait a minute - collisions between satellites, collisions between nuclear submarines, billion dollar high speed train projects in the desert?  What the hell is going on here?

The Stimulus and “Atlas Shrugged”

And now for an inside observation for Ayn Rand fans… How incredibly ironic is it that Obama flew to Denver to sign the “Stimulus Package”? 

Or was it a poke in the eye?